How did you approach the casting of this film???

STEVEN SODERBERGH: I think you have an idea, and you stick with that idea until you’re confronted with the fact that there’s something better than your idea. I think the smart play is to go with the better idea.??


In the case of Andie I was laboring under the illusion that she was not much more than a model and couldn’t deliver what was required. Fortunately for me, she came in and proved me wrong. And I was happy to be proven wrong.??

It happened to me the other day on a movie we’re starting next month. It’s a supporting role, and one of the people who came in was someone I know and who, on first blush, I would have said, ‘No, I don’t think he’s really right for this.’ Of all the people I was looking at, he was the one I would have potentially said, ‘I know him and I think he’s good, I just don’t think he’s right for this.’ Sure enough, when I sat down and looked at what he did, I immediately said, ‘Oh, that’s the guy.’??

What was it that made the difference???

STEVEN SODERBERGH: He did something that was different from what I’d seen him do, and different from what other people were choosing to do, and suddenly he seemed like the only guy who should be doing it. So you have to keep your prejudices in check.??

I’m a big believer that you get the cast you’re supposed to get. I’ve had people drop out, many, many, many times, and always, in retrospect, I felt they dropped out because I was supposed to get somebody better. That’s just the way it works.??

How do you rehearse?

STEVEN SODERBERGH: I used to really rehearse properly, until I realized that I was really using the rehearsal time to get a sense of them personally, and to see if I could in some efficient way unlock a method of communicating with them. And once I realized that, I started being much less formal about the time that we were spending together. And now it’s become like a Fellini thing, where I just take them all out to dinner and get them juiced up and leave it at that.

On that movie, I felt I had more time to do the work than I have had since on any movie. That was the only movie where I never once felt rushed and felt like I had all the time I needed to do the work on a given day. And every film since then, I’ve felt like I didn’t have enough time.

You seem to love juggling a lot of projects at one time. Why is that?

STEVEN SODERBERGH: As my career has gone on, I’ve gotten more and more aggressive about keeping my plate full. I’ve got some things that I want to do, so many ideas that I’d like to pursue, that’s it hard to find time to do all of them. I’m mystified by directors who say, ‘I can’t find anything I want to do.’ I look around and I want to do everything. There are stories everywhere.

I guess it depends on what kind of film you want to make. I like all kinds of films, and so I’m casting a much wider net than some other directors. The algorithm, more often than not, is that a director has a certain aesthetic and he or she looks for material that will be well-served by that aesthetic. I’m just the opposite. I’m totally story-driven, and then I sit down and try to determine what aesthetic is going to work best for this story. So that gives me a lot more freedom.

Is there any downside to your job?

STEVEN SODERBERGH: It’s the best job in the world, it really is. It’s really difficult for me to find any downside to it. It’s what I love to do. It’s hard, but it’s not like work to me. I jump out of bed, ready to go. It’s pretty great.

Out of Focus

developments Comments Off
Dec 312011


What do you do when you (as a filmmaker) discover that one of your shots is out of focus?…

Not only is it too late to fix it… but every take has the same problem. The actor you need has already gone home and can’t come back because they are off on another shoot. And it just isn’t in the budget to get them back anyway.

That’s where creative filmmaking comes into play.

This scerario happened to us on our last film. We still can’t quite figure out how it happened, because the shots taken before and after the one in question are fine. But every take we did of this one particular shot in Dear J did not match the rest of the movie; or the rest of the scene, for that matter.

We actually realized the shot was no good while we were still on set, but only AFTER we wrapped for the day. The actors had gone and as we watched some of the dailies for that day, well, our hearts began to sink.

Karen Lynn Gorney as the JudgeNot only was the shot key to the scene, but it involved the Judge (played by Karen Lynn Gorney — Yes, the same Karen Lynn Gorney who played opposite of John Travolta in ‘Saturday Night Fever’)… And she was off to shoot in Florida or something the next day.

First attempt at fixing this mistake: We decided to do the shot again, this time without her in it… using a double and only getting the Judge’s arm in the frame. And although we reviewed the footage, you can tell we were rather harried because we got Fumbles (played by Myron Buchholz) to use the wrong arm when he whispers his message to the Judge! (We actually didn’t realize this mistake until we began editing the movie about a month later.)

That version of things stayed in the movie for over a year during the post-production phase. And it even made it into the version we showed at the gala in October 2007. (There’s a little trivia for you!)

But then, shortly before we burned the final DVD version, we had a breakthrough… Firstly, we reasoned, this whole scene takes place in the imaginery courtroom, right? Secondly, it’s part of a discussion between the two psychologists, Dr. Donovin and Dr. Frolick, as they discuss James’ situation. Therefore, if the original footage is grainy, why not make that whole particular scene grainy?

We tried it, and voila! It worked… Serendipitiously, it actually makes the scene work.

Necessity is the mother of invention… or in this case, at least of creativity.

Dec 302011

Filmmaking is sometimes just a big game of Where’s Waldo.

There are so many cords and microphones and other equipment, that these items often sneak their way into shots. (All movies seem to be suceptable to this problem. Just take a look at the “Goofs” section for practically any movie at IMDb.)

For us, on Under Jakob’s Ladder, it was all those yellow extention cords.

(That’s right, we had extention cords that kept trying to make their acting debut.)

Often what you do to disguise a piece of equipment or unwanted object is to cover it up with something… put a person or piece of furniture between it and the camera. Of course, that isn’t always the best solution, especially if the camera is on dolly tracks and has to move. Or the character has to move at some point in the dialogue.

As you can see in the photo, we usually tried to clip the cords up on the ceiling. Or we’d run them along the edge of the wall and cover them up with straw or a blanket.

But still, for each shot we filmed, those of us in Video Village had to keep a close eye on the screen to make sure “Waldo” didn’t turn up! (Sorry, Waldo!)

On Episode Five of Christine & Ted Talk To Directors At Sundance ’09, Lee Daniels, director of Precious, talks about how talking as a producer, is much different that talking as a director:

© 2011 science fiction in motion